Śrīmad Bhāgavatam – Page 37

na karma-bandhanaṁ janma vaiṣṇavānāṁ ca vidyate

na karma-bandhanaṁ janma vaiṣṇavānāṁ ca vidyate |
viṣṇor anucaratvaṁ hi mokṣam āhur manīṣiṇaḥ ||
na dāsyam amareśasya bandhanaṁ parikīrtitam |
sarva-bandhana-nirmuktā hari-dāsā nirāmayāḥ ||
(Padma Purāṇa: 6.229.58-59; cited in Hari-bhakti-vilāsa: 10.169–170; Prīti Sandarbha: 16, 45; Krama-sandarbha-ṭīkā and Sārārtha-darśinī-ṭīkā on Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 4.9.29)

“The birth of Vaiṣṇavas is not [produced by] bondage in karma, since the wise call being an attendant of Viṣṇu mokṣa. Servitude to the immortal Lord is not described as bondage, since Hari’s servants are completely free from all bondage [i.e., that which causes entanglement in saṁsāra] and unmarred [i.e., faultless, alt., free from disease].”

Read on →

vande śrī-kṛṣṇa-caitanyaṁ bhagavantaṁ kṛpārṇavam

vande śrī-kṛṣṇa-caitanyaṁ bhagavantaṁ kṛpārṇavam |
prema-bhakti-vitānārthaṁ gauḍeṣv avatatāra yaḥ ||
(Bṛhad Vaiṣṇava-toṣaṇī-ṭīkā on Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 10.1.1; cited in Daśa-ślokī-bhāṣyam: 1.7)

“I worship the ocean of grace Bhagavān Śrī Kṛṣṇa Caitanya, who descended in Gauḍa to distribute prema-bhakti.”

Read on →

ahaṁ mamābhimānotthaiḥ kāma-lobhādibhir malaiḥ

ahaṁ mamābhimānotthaiḥ kāma-lobhādibhir malaiḥ |
vītaṁ yadā manaḥ śuddham aduḥkham asukhaṁ samam ||
tadā puruṣa ātmānaṁ kevalaṁ prakṛteḥ param |
nirantaraṁ svayaṁ-jyotir aṇimānam akhaṇḍitam ||
jñāna-vairāgya-yuktena bhakti-yuktena cātmanā |
paripaśyaty udāsīnaṁ prakṛtiṁ ca hataujasam ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 3.25.16-18; cited in Paramātma Sandarbha 45)

“When the mind is freed from the contamination of lust, greed, and so forth produced by the conceits of ‘I’ and ‘mine,’ and [thus] pure, being without unhappiness, without happiness, and equanimous, then the puruṣa [i.e., the jīva], with a mind (ātmā) endowed with jñāna [i.e., discernment] and vairāgya [i.e., the absence of the conceits of ‘I’ and ‘mine’], and [necessarily also] endowed with bhakti, sees himself to be distinct from prakṛti [i.e., from the transformations of prakṛti and avidyā], eternal [alt., free from coverings of the gross and subtle body], self-luminous [i.e., luminous to his own self], minute [i.e., subtle], and undivided [i.e., indivisible], and [sees] prakṛti [i.e., avidyā] to be devoid of ability [to affect him].”

Read on →

kṛṣṇāya vāsudevāya haraye paramātmane

kṛṣṇāya vāsudevāya haraye paramātmane |
praṇata-kleśa-nāśāya govindāya namo nama ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 10.73.16)

[The 20,800 kings released after Jarāsandha’s defeat pray to Śrī Kṛṣṇa:] “Obeisance and obeisance unto Kṛṣṇa [i.e., Svayaṁ Bhagavān], Vāsudeva [i.e., he who has appeared as the son of Vasudeva], Hari [i.e., he who removes suffering and captivates the mind], Paramātmā [i.e., he who is the ultimate object of prema], the destroyer of the distress of the humble [i.e., his bhaktas], Govinda [i.e., he who sports in Vraja as a cowherd].”

Read on →

yasyāsti bhaktir bhagavaty akiñcanā

yasyāsti bhaktir bhagavaty akiñcanā
sarvair guṇais tatra samāsate surāḥ |
harāv abhaktasya kuto mahad-guṇā
manorathenāsati dhāvato bahiḥ ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 5.18.12; cited in Hari-bhakti-vilāsa: 10.561; Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu: 1.1.29; Bhakti Sandarbha: 109; Caitanya-caritāmṛta: 1.8.58, 2.22.76)

“[Prahlāda Mahārāja to Bhagavān Nṛsiṁha:] The suras along with all qualities reside in full within one who has unconditional bhakti to Bhagavān. How could a non-bhakta of Hari running outwards after the asat as a result of desire have the qualities of the mahats?”

Read on →

ye’bhyarthitām api ca no nṛ-gatiṁ prapannā

ye’bhyarthitām api ca no nṛ-gatiṁ prapannā
jñānaṁ ca tattva-viṣayaṁ saha-dharma yatra |
nārādhanaṁ bhagavato vitaranty amuṣya
sammohitā vitatayā bata māyayā te ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 3.15.24; cited in Bhakti Sandarbha: 108)

[Brahmā to Maitreya:] “Bata! (Alas!) Even those who have attained a human state [i.e., life] wherein jñāna (awareness) relating to Tattva along with dharma are present, which is sought by us [i.e., by Brahmā and the other devas], but do not offer worship to Bhagavān [i.e., he who is source of all dharma and all jñāna] are thoroughly bewildered by his all-pervading māyā.”

Read on →

bhāvini bhūta-vad upacāraḥ

bhāvini bhūta-vad upacāraḥ |
(Kātantra-vyākaraṇa: 26; cited in the Amṛta-ṭīkā on Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇam: 859, Krama-sandarbha-ṭīkā on Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 3.21.25)

“The figure of speech in the case of the immediate future being [spoken of] as if in the immediate past [i.e., there is a figure of speech in which something that is just about to a happen is spoken of as having already happened].”

Read on →

yasmin yato yarhi yena ca yasya yasmād

yasmin yato yarhi yena ca yasya yasmād
yasmai yathā yad uta yas tv aparaḥ paro vā |
bhāvaḥ karoti vikaroti pṛthak svabhāvaḥ
sañcoditas tad akhilaṁ bhavataḥ svarūpam ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 7.9.20; cited in the Amṛta-ṭīkā to Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇa: Kāraka-prakaraṇa, Maṅgalācaraṇa)

“That in which, because of which, at which [time], by which, of which, from which, for which, with which [manner], and even which a latter or former entity of distinct nature [from you] who is impelled [by you] creates or transforms is all your nature.”

Read on →

yatra yena yato yasya yasmai yad yad yathā yadā

yatra yena yato yasya yasmai yad yad yathā yadā |
syād idaṁ bhagavān sākṣāt pradhāna-puruṣeśvaraḥ ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 10.85.4; cited in the Amṛta-ṭīkā to Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇa: Kāraka-prakaraṇa, Maṅgalācaraṇa)

“In which, by which, from which, of which, for which, with which, and when whatever may be—this is [all simply] Bhagavān himself [i.e., everything in the world is an expression of Bhagavān], the Īśvara of pradhāna and the Puruṣa.”

Read on →

bhidyate bhrātaro dārāḥ pitaraḥ suhṛdas tathā

bhidyate bhrātaro dārāḥ pitaraḥ suhṛdas tathā |
ekāsnigdhāḥ kākiṇinā sadyaḥ sarve’rayaḥ kṛtāḥ ||
arthenālpīyasā hy ete saṁrabdhā dīpta-manyavaḥ |
tyajanty āśu spṛdho ghnanti sahasotsṛjya sauhṛdam ||
(Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 11.23.20–21)

“[Even] United and greatly affectionate brothers, wives, parents, and friends are all immediately turned into enemies and divided by twenty cowries [i.e., even by an extremely small amount of money]. For even a small amount of wealth, they quickly become disturbed, inflamed, and inimical, reject one another, give up their affection, and destroy one another.”

Read on →