Purāṇas

bhūmau skhalita-pādānāṁ bhūmir evāvalambanam

bhūmau skhalita-pādānāṁ bhūmir evāvalambanam |
tvayi jātāparādhānāṁ tvam eva śaraṇaṁ prabho ||
(Skanda Purāṇa: 2.2.38.70; cited in Sādhanāmṛta-candrikā: 2.26)

“The ground is the only support for those whose feet have tripped on the ground. [Similarly,] You are the only shelter for those who have committed offense to you, O Master!”

Read on →

yāvatā syāt sva-nirvāhaḥ svīkuryāt tāvad artha-vit

yāvatā syāt sva-nirvāhaḥ svīkuryāt tāvad artha-vit |
ādhikye nyūnatāyāṁ ca cyavate paramārthataḥ ||
(Nāradīya Purāṇa; cited in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu: 1.2.108)

“One who is sagacious [lit., ‘a knower of utility’] should accept as much as shall be supportive for oneself. One becomes deviated from the ultimate goal as a result of excess and deficiency.”

Read on →

harer nāma harer nāma harer nāmaiva kevalam

harer nāma harer nāma harer nāmaiva kevalam |
kalau nāsty eva nāsty eva nāsty eva gatir anyathā ||
(Bṛhan-Nāradīya-purāṇa; cited in Bhakti Sandarbha: 273; Caitanya-caritāmṛta: 1.7.76, 1.17.21, 2.6.242)

“The name of Hari, the name of Hari—certainly the name of Hari alone—in the Age of Kali, there is certainly no, there is certainly no, there is certainly no way otherwise.”

Read on →

yadi vo’sti mayi prītiḥ ślāghyo’haṁ bhavatāṁ yadi

yadi vo’sti mayi prītiḥ ślāghyo’haṁ bhavatāṁ yadi |
tadātma-bandhu-sadṛśī buddhir vaḥ kriyatāṁ mayi ||
nāhaṁ devo na gandharvo na yakṣo na ca dānavaḥ |
ahaṁ vo bāndhavo jāto nātaś cintyam ato’nyathā ||
(Viṣṇu Purāṇa: 5.13.11–12; cited in Bhakti Sandarbha: 325)

“If you all have love (prīti) for me, and if you all [also] consider I am praiseworthy [i.e., a worthy object of reverence], then you all should [give up your awe and reverence of me and] foster the attitude in regard me that I am like the kinsmen (bandhu) of your very self (ātmā) [i.e., that I am one of your fellow cowherds, alt., that I am like the dear friend (bandhu) of your heart (ātmā)]. I am neither a deva, nor a gandharva, nor a yakṣa, nor a dānava. I have been born as your kinsmen (bāndhava—bandhu), and thus from now on I am not to be thought of otherwise [i.e., as anyone other than one of your fellow cowherds and kinsmen; I should not be thought of as any sort of devatā].”

Read on →

aṣṭādaśa-purāṇeṣu vyāsasya vacana-dvayam

aṣṭādaśa-purāṇeṣu vyāsasya vacana-dvayam |
paropakāraḥ puṇyāya pāpāya para-pīḍanam ||
(Mahāsubhāṣita-saṅgraha: 3587)

“Throughout the eighteen Purāṇas, Vyāsa has [just] two [fundamental] statements: benefiting others leads to merit (puṇya) and troubling others leads to sin (pāpa).”

Read on →

svātantryāt kriyate karma na ca vedoditaṁ mahat

svātantryāt kriyate karma na ca vedoditaṁ mahat |
vinaiva bhagavat-prītyā te vai pāṣaṇḍinaḥ smṛtāḥ ||
(Padma Purāṇa: Uttara-khaṇḍa, 235.9a, 7a; cited in Bhakti Sandarbha: 312)

“One who performs [even] great acts described in the Veda independently [i.e., not out of adherence to the guidance of the Vedas] and without affinity for Bhagavān—they are known as heretics (pāṣaṇḍis).”

Read on →

mama śāstraṁ bahiṣkṛtya asmākaṁ yaḥ prapadyate

mama śāstraṁ bahiṣkṛtya asmākaṁ yaḥ prapadyate |
muktvā ca mama śāstrāṇi śāstram anyat prabhāṣase ||
(Varāha Purāṇa; cited in Hari-bhakti-vilāsa: 8.460)

“One who excludes śāstra related to me and takes shelter in me [alt., approaches me, that is, performs upāsanā (worship)], and one who rejects śāstras related to me and teaches other śāstra … [commits offense to me].”

Read on →

atrāgny-ādau tad-antaryāmi-rūpasyaiva cintanaṁ kāryam

atrāgny-ādau tad-antaryāmi-rūpasyaiva cintanaṁ kāryam, na jātu nija-prema-sevā-viśeṣāśraya-svābhīṣṭa-rūpa-viśeṣasya | sa tu sarvathā parama-sukumāratvādi-buddhi-janitayā prītyaiva sevanīyaḥ | … teṣāṁ yathā-bhakti-rītyā parameśvarasyāpi tathā-bhāvaḥ śrūyate | yathā nāradīye—bhakti-grāhyo hṛṣīkeśo na dhanair dharaṇī-surāḥ | bhaktyā saṁpūjito viṣṇuḥ pradadāti manoratham || jalenāpi jagannāthaḥ pūjitaḥ kleśahā hariḥ | paritoṣaṁ vrajaty āśu tṛṣārtaḥ sujalair yathā || iti | … paricaryā-vidhau tad-deśa-kāla-sukhadāni śataśo vihitāni | tad-viparītāni niṣiddhāni ca | … ata evoktaṁ—‘yad yad iṣṭatamaṁ loke’ … | tatra tatreṣṭa-mantra-dhyāna-sthalaṁ ca sarva-rtu-sukhamaya-manohara-rūpa-rasa-gandha-sparśa-śabda-mayatvenaiva dhyātuṁ vihitam asti | anyathā tat-tad-āgrahasya vaiyarthyaṁ syāt | tasmād agny-ādau tat-tad-antaryāmi-rūpa eva bhāvya iti sthitam |
(Bhakti Sandarbha: 295)

“Now [in regard to worship of Bhagavān], in [locations such as] fire and so forth, thought only of his form as the Inner Regulator (Antaryāmī) is to be performed, and never of one’s own specific cherished form [of Bhagavān, i.e., one’s Iṣṭa-devatā], who is the recipient of one’s own specific loving service (prema-sevā). He [i.e., one’s Iṣṭa-devatā], rather, is always to be served with love (prīti) manifest from the sense of [his] being supremely tender and so forth. … Even the Supreme Lord’s being just as is the manner of their [i.e., bhaktas’] bhakti [i.e., even Bhagavān’s appearing to his bhaktas in a form and manner perfectly suited to reciprocate exactly the bhāva and service his bhaktas offer him] is heard of, as in Nāradīya Purāṇa [2.3.3–4]: ‘O suras of the earth [i.e., O brāhmaṇas]! Hṛṣīkeśa is attainable by bhakti, and not by wealth. Viṣṇu, [upon being] fully worshiped with bhakti, grants one’s desire. Hari, the Lord of the universe and destroyer of distress, [upon being] worshiped even with water, quickly becomes fully satisfied just as a person afflicted with thirst does by [receiving] pure water.’ … In rendering attendance [to Śrī Bhagavān], hundreds of pleasing arrangements in accord with the time and place are enjoined, and their opposites are forbidden [i.e., all offerings of service to Śrī Bhagavān should be in accord with the time and place so as to be pleasing to him, and offerings that are contrary to what is pleasing in a given time and place are forbidden]. … Therefore, it is said [by Bhagavān Śrī Kṛṣṇa in SB 11.11.41], ‘Whatever is most desired in the world and whatever is most dear to oneself—offer that to me. This leads to the infinite.’ … In each case, it is enjoined to meditate on the place of meditation related to the mantra of one’s cherished object [i.e., as one meditates on one’s Iṣṭa-devatā and one’s mantra related to him, the environment in which one’s Iṣṭa-devatā is situated is to be meditated on] as being filled with forms, tastes, fragrances, textures, and sounds that are charming and pleasing in all seasons. Otherwise, futility of the insistence on such particulars [i.e., of the śāstra’s injunctions to meditate on one’s Iṣṭa-devatā situated in his abode being served in a pleasing manner] would occur. Therefore, it is established that in fire and elsewhere only the appropriate form of the Inner Regulator (Antaryāmī) is to be meditated [and not the form of one’s Iṣṭa-devatā].”

Read on →

Scroll to Top