Unknown Source

kecid bhagnāḥ sudhyupāsya-prayoge

kecid bhagnāḥ sudhy-upāsya-prayoge
kecid bhagnā rāma-śabda-prayoge |
kecid bhagnās tad-dhita-prakriyāyāṁ
sarve bhagnāḥ kāraka-prakriyāyām ||
(Unknown Source)

“Some are defeated in the section on eliding [i.e., sandhi, as in the case of the eliding of the words sudhī and upāsya to form the compound sudhyupāsya]. Some are defeated in the section on declension [i.e., wherein the word rāma is typically the first word practiced]. Some are defeated in the section on irregular affixes [i.e., the forming of nouns from other nouns, as in the case of forming the word taddhita from tat and hita]. All are defeated in the section on syntax [i.e., kārakas].”

Read on →

kāṇādaṁ pāṇinīyaṁ ca sarva-śāstropakārakam

kāṇādaṁ pāṇinīyaṁ ca sarva-śāstropakārakam |
(Unknown source)

“The work of Kaṇāda [i.e., Vaiśeṣika-darśana, or, loosely, logic] and the work of Pāṇini [i.e., vyākaraṇa, or, loosely, grammar] are helpful in all śāstras [i.e., all fields of knowledge].”

Read on →

viśeṣyasya hi yal-liṅgaṁ vibhakti-vacane ca ye

viśeṣyasya hi yal-liṅgaṁ vibhakti-vacane ca ye |
tāni sarvāṇi yojyāni viśeṣaṇa-padeṣv api ||
(Vaiyākaraṇa-sampradāyaḥ; cited in a footnote to Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇa: 304)

“The gender (liṅga), along with the case (vibhakti) and number (vacana), of the qualificand (viśeṣya)—all of these are to be applied to modifier words (viśeṣaṇa-padas) as well.”

Read on →

kāryiṇā hanyate kāryī kāryāṁ kāryeṇa hanyate

kāryiṇā hanyate kāryī kāryāṁ kāryeṇa hanyate |
nimittaṁ ca nimittena yac cheṣam anuvartate ||
(Unknown source; cited in the Vṛtti on Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇam: 50)

“A kāryī [i.e., the object of an operation] is eliminated by a kāryī. A kārya (operation) is eliminated by a kārya. A nimitta (cause of an operation) is eliminated by a nimitta. And that which remains carries over [from the previous sūtra].”

Read on →

kṛtasyāsmaraṇe kartur atyantāpahnave’pi ca

kṛtasyāsmaraṇe kartur atyantāpahnave’pi ca |
darśanāder abhāve ca tridhā vidyāt parokṣatā ||
(Unknown source; cited in the Amṛta-ṭīkā on Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇa-vṛtti: 1062)

“Know the state of parokṣa to be of three types: (1) when the agent (kartā) has no remembrance of an action; (2) when the agent completely denies the action; and (3) when the agent had no vision and so forth [i.e., perception] of the action.”

Read on →

dhātu-sūtra-gaṇoṇādi-vākya-liṅgānuśāsanam

dhātu-sūtra-gaṇoṇādi-vākya-liṅgānuśāsanam |
āgama-pratyayādeśā upadeśāḥ prakīrtitāḥ ||
(Unkown source; cited in the Amṛta-ṭīkā on Hari-nāmāmṛta-vyākaraṇa: 2.5)

“Dhātus, sūtras, gaṇas [i.e., groups of words that follow the same rules], uṇādi-sūtras, vākyas [i.e., Kātyāyana’s vārttikas], Liṅgānuśāsana [i.e., a work dealing with the rules of gender attributed to Pāṇini], āgamas, pratyayas, and ādeśas are called upadeśas.” 

Read on →

Scroll to Top