Texts

cira-kāla nāhi kari prema-bhakti-dāna

cira-kāla nāhi kari prema-bhakti-dāna |
bhakti vinā jagatera nāhi avasthāna ||14||
sakala jagate more kare vidhi-bhakti |
vidhi-bhaktye vraja-bhāva pāite nāhi śakti ||15||
aiśvarya-jñānete saba jagat miśrita |
aiśvarya-śikhila-preme nāhi mora prīta ||16||
aiśvarya-jñāne vidhi-bhajana kariyā |
vaikuṇṭhete yāya catur-vidha mukti pāyyā ||17||
sārṣṭi, sārūpya, āra sāmīpya, sālokya | …
āpani kariba bhakta-bhāva aṅgīkāre |
āpani ācari bhakti śikhāimu sabhāre ||20||
āpani nā kaile dharma śikhāna nā yāya |
ei ta siddhānta gītā-bhāgavate gāya |21|| …
yuga-dharma-pravartana haya aṁśa haite |
āmā vinā anye nāre vraja-prema dite ||26||
santv avatārā bahavaḥ paṅkaja-nābhasya sarvvato-bhadrāḥ |
kṛṣṇād anyaḥ ko vā latāsv api premado bhavati ||27||
tāhāte āpana bhakta-gaṇa kari saṅge |
pṛthivīte avatari karimu nānā raṅge ||28||
eta bhāvi kali-kāle prathama sandhyāya |
avatīrṇa hailā kṛṣṇa āpani nadīyāya ||29||
(Caitanya-caritāmṛta: 1.3.14–18, 20–21, 26–29)

“[After his descent (avatāra) at the end of the Dvāpāra-yuga, Śrī Kṛṣṇa mused:] ‘For a long time, I have not bestowed the gift of prema-bhakti [upon the world], and without bhakti the world has no stability. The whole world engages in injunction-based (vidhi) bhakti to me. There is no power in injunction-based bhakti [however] to attain Vraja-bhāva. The whole world is mixed with awareness of [my] aiśvarya (masterdom). My satisfaction does not come about [however] through prema slackened by [awareness of my] aiśvarya. By performing injunction based worship with awareness of [my] aiśvarya, people go to Vaikuṇṭha upon attaining [one or more of] the four types of mukti: sārṣṭi [i.e., possessing opulence akin to mine], sārūpya [i.e., possessing a form akin to mine], sāmīpya [i.e., dwelling in my personal company], and sālokya [i.e., dwelling in my domain]. … [Therefore,] I will personally accept the bhāva of a bhakta, and I will teach everyone bhakti by practicing it personally. Dharma cannot be taught if one does not follow it personally. This is the conclusion sung in the Gītā and Bhāgavatam [see, e.g., BG 4.7–8, 3.24, 3.21]. … Propagation of the dharma for the age can be done by an aṁśa [i.e., a partial manifestation of myself]. No one other than I [however] can bestow Vraja-prema [since it is said], “There may be many all-auspicious avatāras of he of lotus-navel [i.e. Bhagavān], but who other than Kṛṣṇa is the bestower of prema upon even creepers?” Thus, I will personally descend to the earth with my bhaktas and engage in various merriments.’ Musing thus, Kṛṣṇa personally descended in Nadia during the first phase of the Age of Kali.”

Read on →

sadā vaijātyam āptānāṁ jīvānām api tattvataḥ

sadā vaijātyam āptānāṁ jīvānām api tattvataḥ |
aṁśatvenāpy abhinnatvād vijātīya-bhidā mṛtā ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.195)

“Because of even the jīvas who are eternally possessed of categorical distinctiveness (vaijātya) [in relation to Parabrahman] being [nevertheless] non-distinct [from Parabrahman] by virtue of [their] also being a part (aṁśa) [of Parabrahman] in essential nature (tattvataḥ), an interclass distinction (vijātīya-bhidā) [in regard to Parabrahman] is quashed.”

Read on →

paramātmā parabrahma sa eva parameśvaraḥ

paramātmā parabrahma sa eva parameśvaraḥ |
ity evam eṣām aikyena sajātīya-bhidā hatā ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.194)

“He specifically, Paramātmā, is Parabrahman and is the Supreme Īśvara. Thus, in this way, because of their oneness, an intraclass distinction (sajātīya-bhidā) is negated.”

Read on →

na tasya kāryaṁ karaṇaṁ ca vidyate

na tasya kāryaṁ karaṇaṁ ca vidyate
na tat-samaś cābhyadhikaś ca dṛśyate |
parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate
svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca ||
(Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad: 6.8; cited in Dig-darśinī-ṭīkā on Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.179; Bhagavat Sandarbha: 16)

“He [i.e., the Supreme Īśvara] has no effect [i.e., material body] or means [i.e., material senses], and nothing equal to him or superior is visible [i.e., existent]. His parā [i.e., superior] śakti is heard to be verily variegated, inherent (svābhāvikī) [in him], and constituted of [divisions known as] consciousness, strength, and action.”

Read on →

muktau sva-tattva-jñānena māyāpagamato hi saḥ

muktau sva-tattva-jñānena māyāpagamato hi saḥ |
nivartate ghanānanda-brahmāṁśānubhavo bhavet ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.188)

“That [i.e., the delusion of saṁsāra] ceases on account of the withdrawal of māyā in [i.e., upon the attainment of] mukti by means of knowledge of the essential nature (tattva) of the self, and [then for a jīva who thus becomes liberated] the experience of [only] a part (aṁśa) of the condensed bliss of Brahman shall occur.”

Read on →

sac-cid-ānanda-rūpānāṁ jīvānāṁ kṛṣṇa-māyayā

sac-cid-ānanda-rūpānāṁ jīvānāṁ kṛṣṇa-māyayā |
anādy-avidyayā tattva-vismṛtyā saṁsṛtir bhramaḥ ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.187)

“The transmigration (saṁsṛti) [i.e., saṁsāra]—the delusion—of the jīvas, who are eternal being, consciousness, and bliss in constitution, occurs because of oblivion in regard to [their own] essential nature (tattva) because of beginningless ignorance (anādi-avidyā) by means of Kṛṣṇa’s māyā.”

Read on →

atas tasmād abhinnās te bhinnā api satāṁ matāḥ

atas tasmād abhinnās te bhinnā api satāṁ matāḥ |
muktau satyam api prāyo bhedas tiṣṭhed ato hi saḥ ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.186)

“Therefore, they [i.e., the jīvas] are considered by the sat non-distinct from him and also distinct [from him], and therefore even when mukti occurs, that distinction shall certainly remain in most cases.”

Read on →

anādi-siddhayā śaktyā cid-vilāsa-svarūpayā

anādi-siddhayā śaktyā cid-vilāsa-svarūpayā |
mahāyogākhyayā tasya sadā te bheditās tataḥ ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.185)

“They [i.e., the jīvas] are eternally distinguished from him [i.e., Parabrahman] by means of his beginninglessly existent śakti by the name of mahāyoga the nature of which is a manifestation of consciousness.”

Read on →

nitya-siddhās tato jīvā bhinnā eva yathā raveḥ

nitya-siddhās tato jīvā bhinnā eva yathā raveḥ |
aṁśavo visphuliṅgāś ca vahner bhaṅgāś ca vāridheḥ ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.184)

“The jīvas are certainly eternally existent (nitya-siddha) as distinct from him [i.e., Parabrahman] like the [light-] particles of the sun, sparks of a fire, and waves of the ocean [i.e., just as these are distinct from their sources].”

Read on →

jīva-svarūpaṁ yad vastu paraṁ brahma tad eva cet

jīva-svarūpaṁ yad vastu paraṁ brahma tad eva cet |
tad eva sac-cid-ānanda-ghanaṁ śrī-bhagavāṁś ca tat ||
tathāpi jīva-tattvāni tasyāṁsā eva san-matāḥ |
ghana-tejaḥ-samūhasya tejo-jālaṁ yathā raveḥ ||
(Bṛhad Bhāgavatāmṛta: 2.2.182–183)

“‘The existent (vastu) the essential nature (svarūpa) of which is [called] the jīva—if that specifically were [considered] Parabrahman, [then] that specifically would be constituted of condensed eternal being, consciousness, and bliss, and would be Śrī Bhagavān [himself].’ Still, the essential nature (tattva) of the jīvas would be considered by the sat only his [i.e., Parabrahman’s] parts (aṁśas) like the multiplicity of the light [i.e., the light particles] of the sun, which is an aggregate of condensed light.”

Read on →

Scroll to Top