The Latest

  • amantram akṣaraṁ nāsti nāsti mūlam anauṣadham |
    ayogyaḥ puruṣo nāsti yojakas tatra durlabhaḥ ||
    (Unknown source)

    “There is no phoneme that is not a mantra [i.e., that cannot function as a mantra]. There is no root that is not a medicine [i.e., that cannot function as a medicine for some ailment]. There is no person that is incapable [i.e., that cannot somehow perform some sort of useful function]. Rare then is the employer [i.e., it is rare to find someone who knows the potential of things and how to make good use of them under varying circumstances].”

    Read on →: amantram akṣaraṁ nāsti nāsti mūlam anauṣadham

  • svātantryāt kriyate karma na ca vedoditaṁ mahat |
    vinaiva bhagavat-prītyā te vai pāṣaṇḍinaḥ smṛtāḥ ||
    (Padma Purāṇa: Uttara-khaṇḍa, 235.9a, 7a; cited in Bhakti Sandarbha: 312)

    “One who performs [even] great acts described in the Veda independently [i.e., not out of adherence to the guidance of the Vedas] and without affinity for Bhagavān—they are known as heretics (pāṣaṇḍis).”

    Read on →: svātantryāt kriyate karma na ca vedoditaṁ mahat

  • yadyapy akiñcanā bhaktir evābhidheyeti tat-kāraṇatvena tad-bhakta-saṅga evābhidheye sati … |
    (Bhakti Sandarbha: 202)

    “Although unconditional (akiñcanā) bhakti is certainly the abhidheya [i.e., the principal direction of the śāstra, the means to attain the highest end], association with his [i.e., Bhagavān’s] bhaktas is certainly [also] the abhidheya because of its being the cause thereof [i.e., of unconditional (akiñcanā) bhakti].”

    Read on →: yadyapy akiñcanā bhaktir evābhidheyeti

  • tad evaṁ teṣāṁ bahu-bhedeṣu satsu teṣām eva prabhāva-tāratamyena kṛpā-tāratamyena bhakti-vāsanā-bheda-tāratamyena sat-saṅgāt kāla-śaighrya-svarūpa-vaiśiṣṭyābhyāṁ bhaktir udayate | … tatra prathamaṁ tāvat tat-tat-saṅgāj jātena tat-tac-chraddhā-tat-tat-paramparā-kathā-rucy-ādinā jāta-bhagavat-sāmmukhyasya tat-tad-anuṣaṅgenaiva tat-tad-bhajanīye bhagavad-āvirbhāva-viśeṣe tat-bhajana-mārga-viśeṣe ca rucir jāyate |
    (Bhakti Sandarbha: 202)

    “Thus, in this way, bhakti manifests with speciality in nature (svarūpa) and with swiftness or time [i.e., relative slowness] as a result of sat-saṅga in accord with a gradation in types of bhakti-vāsanās [i.e., the predilections for particular forms of bhakti fostered by the sādhus with whom one associates], [as well as] in accord with a gradation in [the degree of] grace [received by an individual from the sādhus with whom one associates], and in accord with a gradation in the potency [i.e., spiritual prowess] of those [sādhus] among the numerous types of sādhus there among [i.e., among all the sādhus who are Vaiṣṇavas]. … In this regard, taste [alt., liking] (ruci) for a specific appearance [i.e., form] of Bhagavān as one’s specific object of worship (bhajanīya), as well as for a specific path of worship (bhajana) of him, manifest in the course of ongoing specific association [i.e., association with a specific type of Vaiṣṇava sādhu] for someone in whom intentness (sāmmukhya) upon Bhagavān has manifested by means first of all of a specific form of śraddhā, a specific form of taste (ruci) for the kathā [i.e., discussion of Bhagavān] of a [specific] paramparā [i.e., lineage of Vaiṣṇava sādhus], and so forth, [which become] manifest as a result of a specific form of association [i.e., the association of a particular Vaiṣṇava sādhu].”

    Read on →: tad evaṁ teṣāṁ bahu-bhedeṣu satsu teṣām eva

  • jñātvājñātvātha ye vai māṁ yāvān yaś cāsmi yādṛśaḥ |
    bhajanty ananya-bhāvena te me bhakta-tamā matāḥ ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 11.11.33; cited in Hari-bhakti-vilāsa: 10.24; Bhakti Sandarbha: 201, 312)

    “Having understood, or not having understood, me as far as I am, for who I am, and of what nature I am, those who worship me with a one-pointed (ananya) bhāva are considered by me the best of bhaktas.”

    Read on →: jñātvājñātvātha ye vai māṁ yāvān yaś cāsmi yādṛśaḥ

  • arthendriyārthābhidhyānaṁ sarvārthāpahnavo nṛṇām |
    bhraṁśito jñāna-vijñānād yenāviśati mukhyatām ||
    na kuryāt karhicit saṅgaṁ tamas tīvraṁ titīriṣuḥ |
    dharmārtha-kāma-mokṣāṇāṁ yad atyanta-vighātakam ||
    tatrāpi mokṣa evārtha ātyantikatayeṣyate |
    vijñāyātmatayā dhīraḥ saṁsārāt parimucyate |
    traivargyo’rtho yato nityaṁ kṛtānta-bhaya-saṁyutaḥ ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgatavatam: 4.22.33–35; cited in Prīti Sandarbha: 1)

    “For human beings, continuous thought [alt., coveting] of wealth and objects of the senses, because of which one becomes diverted from [one’s] knowledge [of śāstra] and realization [of śāstra’s object] and enters primitivity [i.e., inanimate life forms], is destructive of all arthas [i.e., detrimental to the attainment of all the puruṣārthas]. One who desires to cross over the fearsome darkness [i.e., saṁsāra] should never foster attachment (saṅga) to that which is perpetually [alt., exceedingly] destructive of dharma, artha, kāma, and mokṣa. Even therein [i.e., among the four puruṣārthas], mokṣa alone is regarded as being the ultimate artha, since an artha belonging to the tri-varga [i.e., the three puruṣārthas of dharma, artha, and kāma] is forever fraught with fear of death [alt., time, i.e., is perpetually subject to inevitable loss and thus incapable of ever producing true fulfillment].”

    Read on →: arthendriyārthābhidhyānaṁ sarvārthāpahnavo nṛṇām

Scroll to Top