The Latest

  • vinā sarva-tyāgaṁ bhavati na bhajanaṁ hy asu-pateḥ |
    (Caitanyacandrodaya-nāṭaka: 5.22)

    “Without relinquishment of everything [apart from it], worship of the Lord of the life airs [i.e., the Lord of the heart, or, the Lord of one’s life] certainly does not occur [as it is meant to in truth].”

    Read on →: vinā sarva-tyāgaṁ bhavati na bhajanaṁ hy asu-pateḥ

  • śoka-paṅka-nimagnaṁ yaḥ sāṅkhya-yogopadeśataḥ |
    ujjahārārjunaṁ bhaktaṁ sa kṛṣṇaḥ śaraṇaṁ mama ||
    (Subodhinī-ṭīkā on Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā: 2.72)

    “He who by means of instructions
    About the yoga of wisdom
    Uplifted Arjuna,
    His bhakta submerged in the mud of sorrow—
    Kṛṣṇa—
    Is my shelter.”

    Read on →: śoka-paṅka-nimagnaṁ yaḥ sāṅkhya-yogopadeśataḥ

  • so’pi saṅkalpajaṁ viṣṇoḥ pāda-sevopasāditam |
    prāpya saṅkalpa-nirvāṇaṁ nātiprīto’bhyagāt puram ||
    vidura uvāca—
    sudurlabhaṁ yat paramaṁ padaṁ harer
    māyāvinas tac-caraṇārcanārjitam |
    labdhvāpy asiddhārtham ivaika-janmanā
    kathaṁ svam ātmānam amanyatārtha-vit ||
    maitreya uvāca—
    mātuḥ sapatnyā vāg-bāṇair hṛdi viddhas tu tān smaran |
    naicchan mukti-pater muktiṁ paścāt tāpam upeyivān ||
    dhruva uvāca—
    samādhinā naika-bhavena yat padaṁ
    viduḥ sanandādaya ūrdhva-retasaḥ |
    māsair ahaṁ ṣaḍbhir amuṣya pādayoś
    chāyām upetyāpagataḥ pṛthaṅ-matiḥ ||
    aho bata mamānātmyaṁ manda-bhāgyasya paśyata |
    bhava-cchidaḥ pāda-mūlaṁ gatvāyāce yad antavat ||
    matir vidūṣitā devaiḥ patadbhir asahiṣṇubhiḥ |
    yo nārada-vacas tathyaṁ nāgrāhiṣam asattamaḥ ||
    daivīṁ māyām upāśritya prasupta iva bhinna-dṛk |
    tapye dvitīye’py asati bhrātṛ-bhrātṛvya-hṛd-rujā ||
    mayaitat prārthitaṁ vyarthaṁ cikitseva gatāyuṣi |
    prasādya jagad-ātmānaṁ tapasā duṣprasādanam |
    bhava-cchidam ayāce’haṁ bhavaṁ bhāgya-vivarjitaḥ ||
    svārājyaṁ yacchato mauḍhyān māno me bhikṣito bata |
    īśvarāt kṣīṇa-puṇyena phalī-kārān ivādhanaḥ ||
    maitreya uvāca—
    na vai mukundasya padāravindayo
    rajo-juṣas tāta bhavādṛśā janāḥ |
    vāñchanti tad-dāsyam ṛte’rtham ātmano
    yadṛcchayā labdha-manaḥ-samṛddhayaḥ ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 4.9.27–36)

    “[Maitreya:] Even after attaining his desire—that which led [him] to [attaining] the service of Viṣṇu’s feet and because of which his resolve [to propitiate Viṣṇu by means of performing austere worship] was extinguished—he returned home not greatly satisfied.
    “Vidura said: ‘Even after having attained in one birth that supreme abode of gracious Hari [i.e., the “vault of heaven” in the upper most region of the material universe], acquired through worship of his feet and most difficult to attain, why did he who was sagacious [i.e., able to discern between essence and non-essence and cognizant of the ultimate puruṣārtha] consider himself as though unsuccessful [i.e., to have not attained a worthwhile goal]?’
    “Maitreya said: ‘Having been struck at heart by the arrows of the words of his stepmother and remembering them [i.e., those arrow-like words, at the time of his meeting with Śrī Bhagavān], he did not desire mukti [i.e., bhakti, that is, servitude to Śrī Bhagavān and the position of being one of his associates] from the Lord of mukti [i.e., from Śrī Bhagavān] and [thereafter thus] felt remorse.’
    “Dhruva said: ‘After attaining in six months the shade of the feet of he who Sananda and other celibates realized by means of samādhi [only] over the course of many births, I went away [because of] being of separate interest [i.e., because my interest was in an object other than Śrī Bhagavān and thus he did not take me with him to his abode right then]. Oh! Alas! See the mindlessness of I of meager fortune! After having reached the base of the feet of the Destroyer of material existence, I begged for what is perishable. My mind was polluted by the falling, intolerant devas [i.e., by the devas who are inevitably subject to falling from their positions and intolerant of those who attain something beyond them]. Being most wicked, I did not accept the truth of Nārada’s word [when he told me to ignore the harsh remarks of my stepmother that initially prompted me to propitiate Bhagavān for the sake of attaining a kingdom greater than my father’s]. Taking shelter in Bhagavān’s māyā and, as though asleep, being a seer of difference even in a second unreality [i.e., seeing a puruṣārtha other than Śrī Bhagavān as though perceiving unrealities in a dream], I suffered from heartache because of an enemy who was a brother [i.e., I perceived my own brother to be my enemy even though he wasn’t inimical to me at all]. That which was requested [from Śrī Bhagavān] by me is useless, like treatment for a dead person. After propitiating the Self of the universe, the Destroyer of material existence who is difficult to propitiate by means of austerity, I begged for material existence [i.e., something of the realm of material existence that binds one within it], being devoid of fortune. From he who was offering [me] sovereignty [i.e., servitude to himself], honor [i.e., a kingdom and other causes of attaining worldly honor] was begged for by me out of foolishness like unhusked grain is [begged for] from an emperor by a poor man because of being devoid of merit.’
    “Maitreya said: ‘My dear [i.e., dear Vidura], persons like you who delight in the dust of the lotus feet of Mukunda and whose well-being of mind comes about [just] by means of that which is attained of its own accord [i.e., those who are satisfied with and able to draw benefit from whatever it is they encounter] certainly do not desire any object of the self [i.e., any puruṣārtha] other than servitude to him.”

    Read on →: so’pi saṅkalpajaṁ viṣṇoḥ pāda-sevopasāditam

  • bhukti-mukti-spṛhā yāvat piśācī hṛdi vartate |
    tāvad bhakti-sukhasyātra katham abhyudayo bhavet ||
    (Bhakti-rasāmṛtā-sindhu: 1.2.22)

    “As long as the fiend of desire for enjoyment or mukti remains in the heart, how can the emergence of the happiness of bhakti occur there?”

    Read on →: bhukti-mukti-spṛhā yāvat piśācī hṛdi vartate

  • sneha-leśāpekṣā mātra īśvara-kṛpāra |
    sneha-vaśa hañā kare svatantra ācāra ||
    (Caitanya-caritāmṛta: 2.10.139)

    “Īśvara’s grace depends only on a trace of affection. Controlled by affection, it acts independently.”

    Read on →: sneha-leśāpekṣā mātra īśvara-kṛpāra

  • nirviṇṇānāṁ jñāna-yogo nyāsinām iha karmasu |
    teṣv anirviṇṇa-cittānāṁ karma-yogas tu kāminām ||
    yadṛcchayā mat-kathādau jāta-śraddhas tu yaḥ pumān |
    na nirviṇṇo nātisakto bhakti-yogo’sya siddhidaḥ ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 11.20.7–8; cited in Hari-bhakti-vilāsa: 11.553; Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu: 1.2.15; Bhakti Sandarbha: 171; Caitanya-caritāmṛta: 2.22.50)

    “[Śrī Kṛṣṇa to Śrī Uddhava:] In this regard, the practice (yoga) of jñāna of the disinterested and renounced in regard to karmas, the practice of karma of the desirous whose minds are not disinterested in them [i.e., in karmas], and the practice of bhakti of a person who independently becomes possessed of śraddhā in discussion and so forth of me has manifested independently and who is neither disinterested nor excessively attached, is a granter of success.”

    Read on →: nirviṇṇānāṁ jñāna-yogo nyāsinām iha karmasu

Scroll to Top