The Latest

  • dvy-arthaiḥ padaiḥ piśunayec ca rahasya-vastu |
    (Unknown source; cited from a kāma-śāstra in Kāvya-prakāśa, Sāhitya-darpaṇa, and the Vaiṣṇavānandinī-ṭīkā to Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 10.33.26)

    “One should indicate a confidential matter with words that have a double meaning.”

    Read on →: dvy-arthaiḥ padaiḥ piśunayec ca rahasya-vastu

  • labdhātmikā satī rūḍhir bhaved yogāpahāriṇī |
    kalpanīyā tu labhate nātmānaṁ yoga-bādhataḥ ||
    (Kumārila Bhaṭṭa; cited in Jīva Gosvāmī’s ṭīkā to Brahma-saṁhitā: 5.1)

    “The acquired conventional meaning (rūḍhi-artha) [of a word] overrides its etymological meaning (yoga-artha). A word meaning should not be supposed [through etymology] when there is an obstruction to its own etymological meaning [by the conventional meaning in the context of the word’s usage].”

    Read on →: labdhātmikā satī rūḍhir bhaved yogāpahāriṇī

  • rūḍhir yogam apaharati iti nyāya |
    (Unknown source; cited in Kṛṣṇa Sandarbha 106)

    “Conventional meaning (rūḍhi) supersedes etymological meaning (yoga).”

    Read on →: rūḍhir yogam apaharati iti nyāya

  • vyāvṛttir vyavahāro vā lakṣaṇasya prayojanam |
    (Tarka-dīpikā; Amṛta-ṭīkā on Hari-nāmāṛta-vyākaraṇa: 45)

    “The purpose of a characteristic (lakṣaṇa) is differentiation [of the object possessing the characteristic from other objects] and [determining the practical] usage [of the object].”

    Read on →: vyāvṛttir vyavahāro vā lakṣaṇasya prayojanam

  • lakṣyate jñāyate’neneti lakṣaṇam |
    (Amṛta-ṭīkā on Hari-nāmāṛta-vyākaraṇa: 45)

    “That by which something is defined [alt., characterized, recognized, indicated] and known is a lakṣaṇa.”

    Read on →: lakṣyate jñāyate’neneti lakṣaṇam

  • lakṣaṇa-pramāṇābhyāṁ vastu-siddhiḥ, na tu kevala-pratijñā-mātreṇa |
    (Unknown Source)

    “Determination of an object arises from characteristics (lakṣaṇa) and a means of valid cognition (pramāṇa), not merely by an assertion.”

    Read on →: lakṣaṇa-pramāṇābhyāṁ vastu-siddhiḥ

Scroll to Top