The Latest

  • samāsaktaṁ yadā cittaṁ jantor viṣaya-gocare |
    yady evaṁ brahmaṇi syāt tat ko na mucyeta bandhanāt ||
    (Maitrāyaṇīya Upaniṣad: 6.34.5)

    “When a living being’s citta is fully attached to the sphere of the sense objects, if it were to become such [i.e., if it were to become instead fully attached] to Brahman, then who would not become liberated from bondage?”

    Read on →: samāsaktaṁ yadā cittaṁ

  • ayaṁ nijaḥ paro veti gaṇanā laghu-cetasām |
    udāra-caritānāṁ tu vasudhaiva kuṭumbakam ||
    (Hitopadeśa: Mitra-lābhaḥ, 71)

    “‘This is mine,’ or ‘this is someone else’s,’ is the supposing of the small-minded, whereas for those of magnanimous character, the world itself is a family.”

    Read on →: ayaṁ nijaḥ paro veti

  • aśanaṁ me vasanaṁ me jāyā me bandhu-vargo me |
    iti me me kurvāṇaṁ hanti kāla-vṛko puruṣājam ||
    (Mahāsubhāṣita-saṅgraha)

    “‘My food, my cloth, my wife, my relations’—saying, ‘my,’ ‘my’ [continuously], this goat of a man is devoured by the wolf of time.”

    Read on →: aśanaṁ me vasanaṁ me

  • yathaihikāmuṣmika-kāma-lampaṭaḥ
    suteṣu dāreṣu dhaneṣu cintayan |
    śaṅketa vidvān kukalevarātyayād
    yas tasya yatnaḥ śrama eva kevalam ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 5.19.14)

    “The endeavor of a learned person [i.e., the study of śāstra and practice of yoga of one] who fears the passing of the repulsive body, just like someone covetous of objects of enjoyment in the present and the afterlife who worries about his sons, wives, and possessions, is just mere labor [i.e., one’s study of śāstra and practice of yoga are fruitless unless one successfully fixes the mind on Bhagavān and gives up sāṁsārka attachment and thereby fear of death].”

    Read on →: yathaihikāmuṣmika-kāma-lampaṭaḥ

  • athātmano’rtha-bhūtasya yato’nartha-paramparā |
    saṁsṛtis tad-vyavacchedo bhaktyā paramayā gurau ||
    vāsudeve bhagavati bhakti-yogaḥ samāhitaḥ |
    sadhrīcīnena vairāgyaṁ jñānaṁ ca janayiṣyati ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 4.29.36–37)

    “Therefore, termination of [ignorance,] that because of which the succession of anarthas, saṁsāra, exists for the ātmā, the [truly] existent entity, occurs through pure bhakti to Guru [i.e., Bhagavān, or, the teacher of Bhagavad-bhakti], for fully performed bhakti-yoga to Vāsudeva, Bhagavān [i.e., bhakti performed entirely for Bhagavān’s satisfaction without any separate interest—prema-bhakti], will produce real non-attachment (vairāgya) and knowledge (jñāna).”

    Read on →: athātmano’rtha-bhūtasya

  • kalpayitvātmanā yāvad ābhāsam idam īśvaraḥ |
    dvaitaṁ tāvan na viramet tato hy asya viparyayaḥ ||
    (Śrīmad Bhāgavatam: 7.12.10)

    [Translation based on Bhāvārtha-dīpikā:] “As long as the jīva is not capable by means of the ātmā [i.e., by virtue of self-realization, ātma-sākṣātkāra] of determining this [i.e., the body, senses, and so forth] to be a guise [i.e., a mere false appearance], then duality [i.e., perception of distinctions such as, “He is a man; she is a woman,”] does not cease, and certainly thereby one’s misapprehension [i.e., one’s mentality of enjoyment] remains.”

    Read on →: kalpayitvātmanā yāvad

Scroll to Top